Frontiers of Medicine in China

Top Research Topics at Frontiers of Medicine in China?

The main points discussed in the journal deals with Internal medicine, Disease, Gastroenterology, Immunology and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Issues in Internal medicine were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Endocrinology, Oncology and Cardiology. Immune system and Inflammation are Immunology topics of special interest in it.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Pandemic are all subfields of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) research that were featured in Frontiers of Medicine in China.

• Internal medicine (30.23%)
• Disease (10.52%)
• Gastroenterology (8.17%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. (1101 citations)
• Mechanisms of insulin resistance in obesity (376 citations)
• The Continuum of Aging and Age-Related Diseases: Common Mechanisms but Different Rates. (255 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Frontiers of Medicine in China:

The published papers primarily focus on research topics in Internal medicine, Disease, Immunology, Bioinformatics and Inflammation. Aside from discussions in Internal medicine, the journal publications also deal with the subject of Oncology which intersects with Cancer disciplines. While work presented in the published articles provide substantial information on Disease, it also covers topics in Outbreak and Intensive care medicine.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Frontiers of Medicine in China (based on the number of publications) are:

• James Cheng-Chung Wei (19 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Dao Wen Wang (18 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• Baoyan Liu (16 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• João Eurico Fonseca (15 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré (14 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Frontiers of Medicine in China (based on the number of publications) are:

• Huazhong University of Science and Technology (253 papers) published 56 papers at the last edition, 18 more than at the previous edition,
• Shanghai Jiao Tong University (198 papers) published 68 papers at the last edition, 31 more than at the previous edition,
• Peking Union Medical College (150 papers) published 58 papers at the last edition, 34 more than at the previous edition,
• Fudan University (132 papers) published 54 papers at the last edition, 26 more than at the previous edition,
• Zhejiang University (120 papers) published 63 papers at the last edition, 36 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.03% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 24.24% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.27% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 12.97% of all publications and 54.52% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Conclusion

The article mostly covers the aspects of medical research pertinent to China but seems to lack a clear and concise conclusion. The absence of this section could significantly limit the article's depth and comprehensibility especially for readers seeking a quick overview and succinct summary of the key points of the article. Accordingly, a crucially beneficial section would be a comprehensive conclusion that wraps up the article. In summary, the Frontier of Medicine in China journal covers a broad list of research areas, prominently featuring topics in Internal medicine, Disease, Gastroenterology, Immunology, and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The journal exhibits significant impact with most cited papers revealing insights into receptors ACE2 expression, mechanisms of insulin resistance in obesity, and aging and age-related diseases. The experience to innovation index presents a broad range of authors from Novice to Star, reflecting the diverse profiles of contributors. Most papers originate from recognized affiliations, led by Huazhong University of Science and Technology. In pursuing avenues of medical research, the researchers might find parallels, draw insights, and land opportunities for knowledge exchange with nursing. For example, exploring lpn programs georgia could offer nursing perspectives to deepen our understanding of disease management learned from the medical research field.