What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Pathology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Asthma, Immunology, Allergy, Disease and Dermatology.
The various areas that he examines in his Asthma study include Medical history, Allergen, Family medicine, Sinusitis and Pediatrics.
His Sinusitis study combines topics in areas such as Visual analogue scale, Placebo, Internal medicine, Nasal polyps and Azithromycin.
He regularly ties together related areas like Nedocromil in his Immunology studies.
His Disease research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Computational biology and Intensive care medicine.
His Dermatology research incorporates themes from Food allergy, Guideline, Acide Cromoglicique and Atopy.
His most cited work include:
- Consensus statement * on the treatment of allergic rhinitis (550 citations)
- European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. (308 citations)
- GA(2)LEN skin test study I: GA(2)LEN harmonization of skin prick testing: novel sensitization patterns for inhalant allergens in Europe. (234 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
W. J. Fokkens mainly investigates Immunology, Asthma, Allergy, Internal medicine and Surgery.
He frequently studies issues relating to Provocation test and Immunology.
His Asthma research includes elements of Quality of life, Visual analogue scale, Family medicine, Disease and Pediatrics.
His Visual analogue scale research focuses on Randomized controlled trial and how it relates to Placebo.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Health care, Dermatology, Atopic dermatitis, Guideline and Case-control study in addition to Allergy.
W. J. Fokkens combines subjects such as Gastroenterology and Sinusitis with his study of Internal medicine.
He most often published in these fields:
- Immunology (39.23%)
- Asthma (33.85%)
- Allergy (26.92%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?
- Asthma (33.85%)
- Internal medicine (18.46%)
- Allergy (26.92%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Asthma, Internal medicine, Allergy, Disease and Quality of life.
W. J. Fokkens has researched Asthma in several fields, including Quality of life, Integrated care, Family medicine and Comorbidity.
W. J. Fokkens has included themes like Sinusitis and Nose in his Internal medicine study.
His studies deal with areas such as Visual analogue scale and Guideline as well as Allergy.
His Disease research includes themes of Precision medicine and Immunology.
His Computational biology research extends to Immunology, which is thematically connected.
Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Phenotypes and endotypes of rhinitis and their impact on management: a PRACTALL report. (87 citations)
- Positioning the principles of precision medicine in care pathways for allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis - A EUFOREA-ARIA-EPOS-AIRWAYS ICP statement. (76 citations)
- EAACI Position paper on the standardization of nasal allergen challenges. (74 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Pathology
His primary areas of study are Asthma, Allergy, Visual analogue scale, Sinusitis and Physical therapy.
Asthma is a subfield of Internal medicine that he studies.
His Allergy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Alternative medicine and Family medicine.
W. J. Fokkens focuses mostly in the field of Visual analogue scale, narrowing it down to topics relating to Quality of life and, in certain cases, Randomized controlled trial.
The concepts of his Physical therapy study are interwoven with issues in Reliability, Intraclass correlation and Quality of life.
His work deals with themes such as Patient satisfaction, Therapeutic approach and Immunology, which intersect with Precision medicine.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
