D-Index & Metrics Best Publications
Kyler Kuehn

Kyler Kuehn

Lowell Observatory
United States

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Astronomy
  • Galaxy
  • Astrophysics

His primary scientific interests are in Astrophysics, Galaxy, Astronomy, Dark energy and Redshift. His study in Milky Way, Dwarf galaxy, Dark matter, Photometric redshift and Globular cluster are all subfields of Astrophysics. In Galaxy, Kyler Kuehn works on issues like Data set, which are connected to Limiting magnitude, Astronomical Objects, Aperture, Data release and Telescope.

In his study, Higher education is strongly linked to Library science, which falls under the umbrella field of Astronomy. His studies in Dark energy integrate themes in fields like COSMIC cancer database, Weak gravitational lensing, Cosmic microwave background and Planck. His work carried out in the field of Redshift brings together such families of science as Galaxy cluster and Sigma.

His most cited work include:

  • Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing (670 citations)
  • THE DARK ENERGY CAMERA (537 citations)
  • The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview (513 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Kyler Kuehn focuses on Astrophysics, Dark energy, Galaxy, Redshift and Astronomy. Milky Way, Weak gravitational lensing, Supernova, Sky and Dark matter are among the areas of Astrophysics where he concentrates his study. He combines subjects such as Globular cluster, Metallicity, Dwarf galaxy and Large Magellanic Cloud with his study of Milky Way.

The Dark energy study combines topics in areas such as Gravitational wave, Telescope, Cosmic microwave background and Cluster analysis. He frequently studies issues relating to Photometry and Galaxy. While the research belongs to areas of Redshift, he spends his time largely on the problem of Quasar, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Active galactic nucleus.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Astrophysics (75.79%)
  • Dark energy (45.23%)
  • Galaxy (43.03%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Astrophysics (75.79%)
  • Dark energy (45.23%)
  • Galaxy (43.03%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Kyler Kuehn mainly investigates Astrophysics, Dark energy, Galaxy, Redshift and Cosmology. The concepts of his Dark energy study are interwoven with issues in Planck, Supernova, Weak gravitational lensing, Cosmic microwave background and Dark matter. His Supernova study contributes to a more complete understanding of Astronomy.

His Galaxy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Deep learning and Artificial intelligence. His Sersic profile study in the realm of Redshift connects with subjects such as Type. His Cosmology study incorporates themes from Amplitude, COSMIC cancer database, Sigma and Distance modulus.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • First cosmological results using Type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Measurement of the Hubble constant (112 citations)
  • First cosmology results using type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: constraints on cosmological parameters (110 citations)
  • First Measurement of the Hubble Constant from a Dark Standard Siren using the Dark Energy Survey Galaxies and the LIGO/Virgo Binary-Black-hole Merger GW170814 (100 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Astronomy
  • Galaxy
  • Statistics

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Astrophysics, Dark energy, Galaxy, Redshift and Cosmology. Much of his study explores Astrophysics relationship to Normalization. His Dark energy research includes themes of Sky, Supernova, Weak gravitational lensing, Cosmic microwave background and Universe.

His research on Galaxy frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Binary black hole. His biological study deals with issues like Black hole, which deal with fields such as Galaxy formation and evolution. His research integrates issues of Planck and Dark matter in his study of Cosmology.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

T. M. C. Abbott;F. B. Abdalla;A. Alarcon;J. Aleksić.
Physical Review D (2018)

975 Citations

THE DARK ENERGY CAMERA

B. Flaugher;H. T. Diehl;K. Honscheid;T. M. C. Abbott.
The Astronomical Journal (2015)

858 Citations

The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models

P. S. Cowperthwaite;E. Berger;V. A. Villar;B. D. Metzger.
The Astrophysical Journal (2017)

682 Citations

A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant

B. P. Abbott;R. Abbott;T. D. Abbott;F. Acernese;F. Acernese.
Nature (2017)

679 Citations

The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview

T. Abbott;F. B. Abdalla;J. Aleksić.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2016)

659 Citations

Eight Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey

A. Drlica-Wagner;K. Bechtol;E. S. Rykoff.
arXiv: Astrophysics of Galaxies (2015)

642 Citations

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: cosmological constraints from cosmic shear

M. A. Troxel;N. MacCrann;N. MacCrann;J. Zuntz;T. F. Eifler.
Physical Review D (2018)

531 Citations

Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT

Fermi-LAT;Des Collaborations;A. Albert;B. Anderson.
arXiv: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (2016)

501 Citations

Eight Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey

A. Drlica-Wagner;K. Bechtol;E. S. Rykoff;E. S. Rykoff;E. Luque.
The Astrophysical Journal (2015)

494 Citations

The dark energy survey data release 1

T. M. C. Abbott;F. B. Abdalla;F. B. Abdalla;S. Allam;A. Amara.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (2018)

452 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Kyler Kuehn

Daniel Gruen

Daniel Gruen

Stanford University

Publications: 144

Robert A. Gruendl

Robert A. Gruendl

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 143

Masamune Oguri

Masamune Oguri

Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe

Publications: 134

Juan Garcia-Bellido

Juan Garcia-Bellido

Autonomous University of Madrid

Publications: 131

E. J. Sanchez

E. J. Sanchez

California Institute of Technology

Publications: 125

Felipe Menanteau

Felipe Menanteau

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 119

M. Carrasco Kind

M. Carrasco Kind

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 113

J. Carretero

J. Carretero

Institute for High Energy Physics

Publications: 105

Catherine Heymans

Catherine Heymans

University of Edinburgh

Publications: 97

Enrique Gaztanaga

Enrique Gaztanaga

Spanish National Research Council

Publications: 93

K. Honscheid

K. Honscheid

The Ohio State University

Publications: 93

D. L. Burke

D. L. Burke

Stanford University

Publications: 93

E. Suchyta

E. Suchyta

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Publications: 92

Risa H. Wechsler

Risa H. Wechsler

Stanford University

Publications: 90

Henk Hoekstra

Henk Hoekstra

Leiden University

Publications: 88

Marcelle Soares-Santos

Marcelle Soares-Santos

Brandeis University

Publications: 88

Trending Scientists

Christian Jutten

Christian Jutten

Grenoble Alpes University

Mikko A. Uusitalo

Mikko A. Uusitalo

Nokia (United States)

Kathryn E. Stecke

Kathryn E. Stecke

The University of Texas at Dallas

Engin U. Akkaya

Engin U. Akkaya

Dalian University of Technology

Charles Mioskowski

Charles Mioskowski

Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

A. J. Van Der Eb

A. J. Van Der Eb

Leiden University

Monika Hilker

Monika Hilker

Freie Universität Berlin

Kelvin S.-H. Peh

Kelvin S.-H. Peh

University of Southampton

Steven L. Pelech

Steven L. Pelech

University of British Columbia

Philip J. Barr

Philip J. Barr

BayMedica, Inc.

Rytis Prekeris

Rytis Prekeris

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Irka Hajdas

Irka Hajdas

ETH Zurich

Adrian A. Harpold

Adrian A. Harpold

University of Nevada, Reno

Lawrence A. Kurdek

Lawrence A. Kurdek

Wright State University

Moussa B.H. Youdim

Moussa B.H. Youdim

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

Myron L. Weisfeldt

Myron L. Weisfeldt

Johns Hopkins University

Something went wrong. Please try again later.