What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Galaxy
- Astronomy
- Astrophysics
His primary scientific interests are in Astrophysics, Galaxy, Galaxy cluster, Redshift and Astronomy.
His research combines Radius and Astrophysics.
His research in Galaxy intersects with topics in Universe and Magnification.
His Galaxy cluster study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Dark energy and Virial theorem.
His Redshift study incorporates themes from Wide Field Camera 3, Advanced Camera for Surveys and Photometry.
His study in the field of Galaxy formation and evolution, Spectral energy distribution and Radio galaxy is also linked to topics like Collision and Field.
His most cited work include:
- THE CLUSTER LENSING AND SUPERNOVA SURVEY WITH HUBBLE: AN OVERVIEW (722 citations)
- Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble (CLASH): An Overview (710 citations)
- Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology (436 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Dan Coe focuses on Astrophysics, Galaxy, Redshift, Astronomy and Galaxy cluster.
His Astrophysics study focuses mostly on Dark matter, Reionization, Weak gravitational lensing, Supernova and Gravitational lens.
His Galaxy study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Photometry.
As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Redshift, concentrating on Stellar mass and frequently concerns with Metallicity.
His studies in Galaxy cluster integrate themes in fields like Strong gravitational lensing, Radius, Virial theorem and Velocity dispersion.
Dan Coe combines subjects such as Galaxy merger, Lenticular galaxy, Interacting galaxy and Surface brightness with his study of Brightest cluster galaxy.
He most often published in these fields:
- Astrophysics (85.56%)
- Galaxy (73.89%)
- Redshift (50.83%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Astrophysics (85.56%)
- Galaxy (73.89%)
- Redshift (50.83%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Astrophysics, Galaxy, Redshift, Reionization and Astronomy.
Galaxy cluster, Stellar mass, Dark matter, Strong gravitational lensing and Photometric redshift are the primary areas of interest in his Astrophysics study.
His research investigates the connection between Galaxy cluster and topics such as Supernova that intersect with problems in Dark energy.
Galaxy is closely attributed to Photometry in his study.
In the field of Redshift, his study on Gravitational lens and Luminosity function overlaps with subjects such as Collision.
The Reionization study combines topics in areas such as Equivalent width, Halo, Stellar population, Luminosity and Billion years.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The Frontier Fields: Survey Design and Initial Results (313 citations)
- The Frontier Fields lens modelling comparison project (133 citations)
- Type Ia Supernova Distances at Redshift > 1.5 from the Hubble Space Telescope Multi-cycle Treasury Programs: The Early Expansion Rate (117 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Galaxy
- Astronomy
- Astrophysics
His primary areas of investigation include Astrophysics, Galaxy, Redshift, Astronomy and Spitzer Space Telescope.
His study in Reionization, Supernova, James Webb Space Telescope, Weak gravitational lensing and Stellar mass is carried out as part of his Astrophysics studies.
His Galaxy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Dark matter and Photometry.
His Redshift study combines topics in areas such as Star formation and Universe.
His Globular cluster study, which is part of a larger body of work in Astronomy, is frequently linked to Visibility, bridging the gap between disciplines.
As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Spitzer Space Telescope, focusing on Library science and, on occasion, Treasury.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
